
Originally Posted by
Beatrix
Jenny,
Yes I walked from San Sebastian to Santiago and the answer to you question is that its not easy.
So if you would like an 'easier' route walk the frances, and then later return and do the north route if you still feel up to it. This is how I did it.
The north route is difficult, big mountains, less infrastructure, less albergues, and less organised. However I met other lonely lady pilgrims on the way, and it was their first pilgrimage. They all said they had a great time. Don't forget that some places on the north coast is more for tourist then pilgrims, and the hotel, hostel prices are higher.
Regarding the paved roads, thats true. half of the way or even more is paved. Initialy I felt that its uncomfortable, but then there were ways without being paved and had a very mudy time on those. I think the reason for the ways to be paved is that the ground is too slippery otherwise.
With Covey, I perfectly agree. To start a pilgrimage, the best option is the french way.
On the north you would have to pay attention to a lot of details (signs, albergues, food, water, altitude, distances) to make sure that you get to Santiago, and there are fewer pilgrims on the north deffinitely. I too had to sleep alone in an albergue once.
The french way is an easier ground, better organised, and better infrastructure, but just as difficult as any other long pilgrimage, in terms of walking. Its a long distance in both route. I think its great, that we have a choice between these two wonderful ways.
Good luck, hard decision, but in any case, I am sure there are some cities where there are buses in between, to change routes.
Bookmarks